Why Payments and EmFi are the lifeline software platforms need in the AI era

Ezgi Bereketli
Staff Product Manager

AI is making software easier to build, faster to copy, and harder to defend as a lasting source of competitive advantage. That matters for every software platform, because workflows, interfaces, and feature sets that once felt differentiated can now be reproduced with increasing speed.
What is much harder to commoditise is the financial infrastructure embedded into how a platform actually moves money. For modern platforms, payments and embedded finance are not side products or secondary monetisation levers. They are the operational rails that determine how money is collected, routed, held, converted, reconciled, and paid out across an ecosystem. As platforms scale across geographies, user types, and business models, those rails become more strategically important.
Embedded Payments remain such a high-leverage sticking point in the AI era. It is not just about enabling acceptance. It is about establishing the foundation for a broader financial stack that can include balances, payouts, FX, issuing, and other embedded financial workflows inside the core product.
Payment acceptance is table stakes
Payment acceptance matters. Conversion, local payment methods, fraud controls, and checkout performance remain important. But for serious platforms, acceptance alone is no longer where durable differentiation lives.
The real complexity begins after the transaction. Once money enters the system, platforms need to deduct fees, split funds between parties, manage settlement timing, hold balances, convert currencies, reconcile transactions, and pay out different users in different ways. That is a much broader challenge than simply processing a card payment, and it is where infrastructure starts to become strategic.
When the underlying setup is fragmented or rigid, the pain shows up quickly. Finance teams struggle with reconciliation, operations teams manage exceptions manually, product teams build workarounds, and end users get a worse experience. The competitive question is no longer just whether a platform can accept payments. It is whether it can orchestrate money well.
The moat is in money movement and financial experience
As platforms mature, their business models become more complex. Some are SaaS companies helping merchants accept payments. Some are marketplaces coordinating flows between buyers and sellers. Others combine software, wallets, financing, and cross-border disbursements into one ecosystem. Many also rely on multiple providers across markets and use cases rather than a single PSP.
That complexity changes what platforms need from financial infrastructure. They need flexibility around fund flows, payout timing, monetisation models, and partner configurations. They may want to collect pay-ins through one provider, use another for payouts, maintain multi-currency balances to reduce FX friction, or offer different access to funds across user segments. A gateway alone cannot solve for that level of control.
It also has a direct impact on product experience. Sellers, merchants, creators, contractors, and service providers increasingly expect smooth onboarding, visibility into balances and payouts, clarity on fees and timing, and more control over how they access earnings. When a platform makes fund flows faster, more transparent, and more predictable, it is not just improving back-end operations. It is increasing trust, reducing support burden, and making the product itself more valuable.
In a world where AI may compress differentiation in the software layer, that matters even more. If workflows can be copied more easily, then a platform that helps users collect, hold, convert, spend, and move money more effectively is creating a form of value that is far harder to replicate.
Global scale widens the gap
The need for stronger infrastructure becomes even clearer once a platform expands internationally. Cross-border growth introduces more currencies, more settlement paths, more compliance requirements, and more operational exceptions. A setup that works in one market often becomes difficult to scale across many, especially when a platform needs to move money between multiple parties in multiple regions at the same time.
At that point, the challenge is not simply whether payments can be accepted in a new market. It is whether the platform can run its full money movement model efficiently and with control as it grows. Multi-currency balances, FX optimisation, broad payout coverage, and clean reconciliation stop being nice-to-haves and become core operating capabilities. For many platforms, the path to international scale runs directly through better embedded finance infrastructure rather than through software alone.
Better infrastructure improves margin
The commercial impact is also easy to miss. The deeper and more integrated the infrastructure, the more efficiently a platform can move money across its ecosystem. That means fewer handoffs between disconnected financial services, less operational overhead, less reconciliation friction, and more control over how value is captured. In practice, better money movement infrastructure does not just improve the product experience. It can also expand platform margins.
Why this is a strong fit for Airwallex
This is also where Airwallex’s infrastructure becomes especially relevant for platforms. Airwallex’s embedded finance offering is built on connected accounts, which provide the foundational infrastructure for products and capabilities including Global Treasury, multi-currency accounts, issuing, Payments for Platforms, and innovative settlement flows. Rather than forcing the platform to receive all funds and manually distribute them, connected accounts allow customers to hold funds, receive inbound transfers, convert currencies, and make payouts in their own name, with Airwallex operating as the regulated layer beneath the platform’s product.
For platforms specifically, Airwallex already supports the core money movement needs this article argues matter most. Platforms can programmatically create connected accounts, automatically split funds, onboard customers through native APIs or embedded components, and offer global pay-in and pay-out experiences. They can also use Airwallex as the payment gateway or keep their existing acquirer and use Airwallex’s PSP-agnostic model for account infrastructure, fund routing, and payouts.
That matters because the value is not limited to acceptance. Airwallex gives platforms the ability to help customers receive funds, hold multi-currency balances, convert FX, and pay out globally from the same underlying infrastructure. Global Treasury supports multi-currency wallets, Global Accounts, and fund conversion, while payout coverage extends to over 200 countries and regions and 90+ currencies, with local clearing connections in 120+ countries and regions.
Just as importantly, this creates a path into a broader embedded finance relationship. With connected accounts, rather than adopting a point solution, platforms gain an extensible foundation they can build on over time, expanding into other innovative embedded financial solutions.
The next era of SaaS differentiation will be financial, not just functional
The platforms that win in the next phase of the market will not treat payments as a checkout feature alone. They will treat financial infrastructure as a core part of product design, monetisation, user trust, and operational scale.
AI will continue to lower the cost of building software and accelerate imitation. For platforms, one of the clearest answers is that durable value increasingly lives where software and financial infrastructure become inseparable. Payment acceptance still matters, but for modern platforms, it is only the beginning.
The material presented here is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, taxation, or investment advice. Readers should engage their own advisors or counsel for advice unique to their circumstances.

Ezgi Bereketli
Staff Product Manager
Posted in:
Embedded finance

