Adyen vs Square: The ultimate 2025 comparison guide for global payments

The Airwallex Editorial Team

Selecting the right payments platform can shape how your business grows. Adyen and Square are two of the most recognised names in the market, but they serve very different needs. Adyen caters to global enterprises handling high volumes and complex requirements, while Square is built for small to medium businesses that want a fast, straightforward way to accept payments.
This guide will compare Adyen vs Square across pricing, features, scalability, and ideal use cases – and introduce Airwallex as a modern alternative for businesses ready to scale globally.
What is Adyen?
Adyen is a Netherlands-based payments company servicing large global enterprises with complex payment needs. Its platform connects directly to local card networks and payment methods, removing the need for third-party processors.
Key features:
Acquiring services across 40+ markets
Wide coverage of local payment methods, including cards, wallets, and bank transfers
Single platform for online, mobile, and point-of-sale transactions
Fraud and risk management through RevenueProtect
Interchange++ pricing model with pass-through transparency
Reporting and reconciliation tools designed for finance teams
Greater control over payment routing without relying on intermediaries
Adyen is built for large merchants with high volumes and international operations, offering deep control over payments, risk, and data.
What is Square?
Square is a US-born point-of-sale and payments platform built for small businesses. Cafes, salons, and local retailers often choose Square for its bundled hardware and software that makes setup quick and easy.
Key features:
Integrated POS hardware and software
Free POS app with optional paid add-ons
Flat-rate, transparent pricing
Online store, invoices, and team management tools
Square is designed to help SMEs accept payments quickly, without complex onboarding or technical setup.
Adyen vs Square: A head-to-head comparison
Features comparison
Feature | Adyen | Square |
---|---|---|
Pricing model | Custom pricing | Flat-rate, transparent |
Online payments | Yes – four options including out-of-the box interface and fully-customisable API | Yes – out-of-the-box checkout & payment links |
In-person POS | Yes (Adyen payment terminals & unified eCommerce APIs) | Yes (Square Reader, Terminal, Register) |
Supported countries | 40+ (local acquiring; broader processing via partners) | Limited: US, CA, AU, JP, UK, IE, FR, ES |
Currencies supported | 150+ currencies supported | Supports 6 currencies (AUD, USD, CAD, GBP, EUR, JPY) but always settles in local currency |
Payment methods | 250+ local methods | Visa, Mastercard, Amex, eftpos (AU) |
Payout speed | Typically 2–3 business days | Next business day or instant for a fee |
Recurring billing | Supported through API | Recurring payments via Square Subscriptions & Invoices |
Chargeback handling | Integrated | No chargeback fee; Square covers eligible disputes |
Hardware costs | Adyen payment terminals (quote-based) | From A$65 |
Ideal customer profile | Enterprises, global businesses | SMEs, local retailers, cafes, service providers |
Adyen vs Square: Fees compared
Fee type | Adyen | Square |
---|---|---|
In-person transactions | Interchange++ (interchange + scheme + markup + AU$0.11 + payment method fee) | 1.6% per tap, insert, or swipe |
Online transactions | Interchange++ model, varies by method and card type | 2.2% per transaction |
Currency conversion | 0.6%–1.2% above market rate | Included in 2.2% online fee; settles in AUD |
Chargebacks | €25 per dispute (refundable if won) | No chargeback fee; Square covers eligible disputes |
Refunds | Original processing fee not returned | Original processing fee not returned |
Payout speed | 2–3 business days (varies by region) | Next business day; Instant for a fee |
Monthly fees | None; minimum invoice may apply | None for basic plan |
Hardware costs | Quote-based Adyen terminals | From A$65 |
POS software | Requires enterprise integration | Free POS app; add-ons available |
Adyen fees explained
Adyen uses an Interchange++ pricing model. This includes:
Interchange fee: set by the issuing bank, varies by country and card type
Scheme fee: set by card networks (Visa, Mastercard, etc.)
Adyen markup: typically 0.6% per transaction (may vary by contract)
Processing fee: AU$0.11 per transaction (Australia-specific) plus payment method fee
Other charges include:
Currency conversion: 0.6%–1.2% above market rate
Chargebacks: €25 per dispute (refundable if you win)
Refunds: original processing fees aren't returned
Monthly fees: none, but minimum invoice amounts may apply
Adyen’s model works best for large merchants with significant volumes who can take advantage of tailored rates and advanced reconciliation tools.
Square fees explained
Square offers simple, flat-rate pricing in Australia:
In-person card payments: 1.6% per tap, insert, or swipe (note: some existing users on older devices see 1.9%)
Online payments & invoices: 2.2% per transaction
No setup or monthly fees for basic services
Hardware: starting from A$65
Add-ons: Square for Restaurants, Retail, Appointments (monthly fees apply)
Payouts: next business day by default, Instant Transfers available for a fee
Square’s flat-rate model is easy to understand and ideal for SMEs, though larger merchants may find it less cost-efficient at scale.
Ready to streamline your payments?
Who is Adyen best for?
Adyen is best suited to:
Large enterprises with global operations
High-volume merchants seeking tailored pricing
Businesses needing direct acquiring in multiple regions
Companies requiring advanced fraud and risk tools
Adyen is powerful, but best suited to enterprises with technical and financial resources.
Who is Square best for?
Square is best suited to:
SMEs, cafes, and local retailers
Businesses wanting fast setup and bundled POS tools
Small businesses that don't handle multiple currencies
Sole traders or small businesses in supported markets
Square’s strength lies in ease of use, though it lacks the global reach and advanced tools of Adyen.
Beyond the basics: Key differences between Adyen and Square
Scale and target market: Adyen is designed for global enterprises handling complex payment needs and large transaction volumes, while Square is better suited for local retailers, cafes, and small service businesses.
Geographic reach: Adyen provides acquiring in over 45 markets, supports 150+ currencies, and enables more than 250 payment methods. Square has a narrower presence, supports around six major currencies, and always settles in the seller’s local currency.
Pricing approach: Adyen’s Interchange++ model passes through interchange and scheme fees with a small markup, which can deliver value for high-volume merchants. Square offers flat, transparent rates that are easy to understand but can become expensive as volumes increase.
Onboarding and setup: Adyen requires underwriting and contractual agreements, making it more suitable for enterprises with dedicated finance and tech teams. Square enables instant signup and quick activation, appealing to small businesses that prioritise speed.
Technology and hardware: Square provides its own ecosystem of POS hardware and free POS software, with optional add-ons for restaurants and retail. Adyen offers enterprise-grade payment terminals and unified commerce APIs, but hardware is quote-based and integrated into custom setups.
Risk and compliance: Adyen includes advanced fraud prevention tools like RevenueProtect and comprehensive compliance controls. Square offers basic risk tools suitable for small businesses but less depth for enterprise-level requirements.
Why Airwallex is a powerful alternative to Adyen and Square
Airwallex gives growing businesses a smarter, simpler way to manage international payments. Where Square focuses on domestic SMEs with flat-rate pricing, and Adyen requires complex enterprise setups, Airwallex combines clarity and control in one platform – without the overhead.
Key benefits of using Airwallex:
Like-for-like settlement in 14+ currencies: Get paid and hold funds in the same currency. No forced conversions and no hidden FX margins.
Open global accounts quickly: Create local currency accounts in minutes, not weeks.
Receive local bank details in 60+ countries: Accept payments like a local business in major markets.
Access real-time FX: Interbank rates on 60+ trade currencies, with 100+ currencies priced live on the spot market.
Cut FX costs by up to 80%: Compared to traditional banks and legacy platforms.
Faster global payouts: Send to 200+ countries, with 120+ using local rails. Over 90% of transfers use local rails. About 95% arrive within hours or the same day, and around 57% are instant.
Accept more ways to pay: Process payments with all major schemes and 160+ local payment methods. Collect in 130+ currencies.
Issue multi-currency cards in 40+ markets: Control team spend with limits, approvals, and real-time tracking.
Manage everything in one place: Payments, FX, virtual cards, expenses, and approvals in one platform.
Airwallex is ideal if:
You’re looking to reduce international transaction fees
You want to hold and manage multiple currencies without juggling accounts
You need fast, reliable payouts across borders
You want a single, modern platform that simplifies global business banking
Final verdict: Choosing the right solution for your business
Adyen and Square are both strong platforms, but built for different users.
Choose Adyen if you’re a global enterprise with high volumes and need direct acquiring and advanced fraud tools.
Choose Square if you’re a small business seeking simplicity, bundled hardware, and quick setup.
But if you want a solution that scales with you, combining global reach, transparent FX, and all-in-one financial tools – Airwallex is the smarter choice.
Ready to streamline your payments?
Adyen vs Square: frequently asked questions
Who is Adyen's biggest competitor?
Adyen’s biggest competitors include Stripe, Square, and Airwallex. Stripe is known for developer-first tools, Square for small business simplicity, and Airwallex for global accounts and transparent FX.
What is better than Square payment processor?
For global operations, platforms like Adyen or Airwallex may be better than Square, as they support more currencies, offer advanced risk tools, and provide stronger cross-border payment capabilities.
Who owns Adyen?
Adyen is a publicly traded company listed on Euronext Amsterdam under the ticker symbol ADYEN. It was founded in 2006 by a team including Pieter van der Does and Arnout Schuijff.
Why choose Adyen?
Enterprise businesses choose Adyen for its unified commerce platform, direct acquiring, and support for 250+ payment methods. Its scalability, fraud prevention tools, and ability to handle high transaction volumes make it attractive to global businesses.
Why consider Airwallex instead?
Airwallex offers many of the enterprise-grade features of Adyen, but with faster onboarding and transparent FX. Compared to Square, it provides true multi-currency accounts and international reach, making it a strong option for growing businesses.

The Airwallex Editorial Team
Airwallex’s Editorial Team is a global collective of business finance and fintech writers based in Australia, Asia, North America, and Europe. With deep expertise spanning finance, technology, payments, startups, and SMEs, the team collaborates closely with experts, including the Airwallex Product team and industry leaders to produce this content.
Posted in:
Business bankingShare
- What is Adyen?
- What is Square?
- Adyen vs Square: A head-to-head comparison
- Who is Adyen best for?
- Who is Square best for?
- Beyond the basics: Key differences between Adyen and Square
- Why Airwallex is a powerful alternative to Adyen and Square
- Final verdict: Choosing the right solution for your business
- Adyen vs Square: frequently asked questions