Expensify vs Airwallex: compare on fees, features and benefits

David Beach
Senior Content Marketing Manager - EMEA

If you’re reading this, it's likely your research into spend management tools has brought you to two possible options – and they’re both fine choices.
There’s still more research and analysis to do, though. We’ve written this article to help you make sense of this last step.
Below, you’ll find a detailed rundown of Expensify and Airwallex’s features, fees, nuances, and pros and cons. We’re not going to tell you to choose one or the other, but we are going to explain the kinds of businesses that are going to thrive with one over the other.
Ready to bring your search to a close? Let’s begin.
What is Expensify?
Expensify is a B2B software company that specialises in expense management. Their tool helps businesses track, approve, and payout expenses.
Self-styled as “the fastest way to do your expenses”, Expensify is all-in on spend management.
What is Airwallex?
Airwallex provides global financial infrastructure for growing businesses. Like Expensify, Airwallex provides a full suite of spend management tools.
On top of expenses, however, Airwallex also offers features including business accounts, quick and cost-effective FX, payment acceptance, and API/embedded finance capabilities.
More info about Airwallex Spend can be found here.
Feature comparison: Expensify vs Airwallex
Both platforms are packed with features – so, if we’re going to compare them, we need to break them up into a few different categories.
We’re going to look at spend management essentials, advanced spend management features, and core finance features.
Comparing spend management essentials
These features are the bread and butter of spend management. Both Expensify and Airwallex provide all of these basics. If you ever find a vendor that can’t offer these features, you should carefully consider their usefulness.
| Expensify | Airwallex |
---|---|---|
Expense submission | ✅ | ✅ |
Multi-layer approval flows | ✅ (only on higher plan) | ✅ |
Card controls | ✅ | ✅ |
Spend reporting | ✅ | ✅ |
Domestic reimbursements | ✅ | ✅ |
Accounting integrations | ✅ | ✅ |
Comparing advanced spend management features
Looking beyond the basics, there are some features that you won’t find with every vendor. These can add even more efficiency or value to your work, so are worth considering if they gel with what you need.
| Expensify | Airwallex |
---|---|---|
Multi-entity management | ✅ | ✅ |
Custom reports | ✅ (only on higher plan) | ✅ |
AI-powered expense processing | ✅ | ✅ |
Budgeting | ✅ (only on higher plan) | ✅ |
International reimbursements | ✅ | ✅ |
In-app travel booking | ✅ | ❌ |
Comparing core finance capabilities
Beyond managing the admin of expenses, there are also wider financial capabilities to consider with both providers.
| Expensify | Airwallex |
---|---|---|
Business accounts | ❌ | ✅ |
Domestic and international transfers | ❌ | ✅ |
FX | ❌ | ✅ |
Payment gateway | ❌ | ✅ |
Invoices and payment acceptance | ✅ | ✅ |
Global card issuing | ❌ only US, UK, and EEA | ✅ including US, UK, and EEA |
Virtual card issuing | ✅ | ✅ |
Comparing fees: Expensify vs Airwallex
On Expensify’s Collect plan, each user you add costs £5/user/month. On their Control plan, new users cost £14/user/month.
With Airwallex, you get five users included on our Explore plan (£0 or £19/month*). To add additional employee card users, you’ll pay £5/user/month. On our Grow and Accelerate plans, additional users cost £12/per active user/month.
We’ve written a guide to help you work out the best Airwallex plan for your business, if you want to get into the details.
The cost for 10 employees
One person managing spend
Cheapest plan (Expensify Collect and Airwallex Explore)
One company card
Expensify | Airwallex | |
---|---|---|
Monthly fee | £0 | £0 or £19* |
Cost of users | £50 | £0 (included) |
Cost of cards | £0 (included) | £0 (included) |
* Grow account fee is £0 if you transact or hold £10,000+ in a calendar month.
The cost for 100 employees
You’re likely on Expensify Control and Airwallex Grow plans
40 active spend users a month
30 company cards
Expensify | Airwallex | |
---|---|---|
Monthly fee | £0 | £49 |
Cost of users | £560 | £420 |
Cost of cards | £0 (included) | £0 (included) |
The cost for 1,000 employees
You’re likely on Expensify Control and Airwallex Accelerate plans
500 active spend users a month
Enterprise plan
100 company cards
Expensify | Airwallex | |
---|---|---|
Monthly fee | Not publicly available | £999 |
Cost of users | £7,000 | £540 |
Cost of cards | £0 (included) | £0 (included) |
Which platform is better for your business?
The headline story when comparing Expensify and Airwallex is that both options can do a lot of what you need. Choose either of them and you’ll be making a good decision.
Still, they aren’t identical. There are clear use cases in which one may be better suited than the other.
Expensify’s areas of outperformance
Companies that:
Are US-based (1% cashback on US spend)
Spend mostly on card
Airwallex’s areas of outperformance
Companies that:
Have internationally distributed staff, suppliers, and clients
Need wider financial infrastructure
Regular domestic and international expenses and bills
Expensify is brilliant for simpler domestic businesses primarily in the US. The cashback feature offered on its card is attractive, but only applies to US purchases.
For companies that want a powerful expense management proposition and additional features across the fintech stack, Airwallex is worth considering.
It’s also important to consider where your business is going to be in the next few years. Whichever provider you choose, you need to feel confident that they can scale (up or down) alongside you.
Why businesses are switching to Airwallex in 2025
The businesses joining Airwallex in 2025 have big ambitions. They’re targeting new markets, increasing efficiency, and simplifying their financial operations.
Finance teams can end up in vendor overwhelm without even realising it. The tools they start using to save time create new bottlenecks and frustrations, making one another redundant. With Airwallex, everything is in one slick and efficient place.
Truvi, for example, switched to Airwallex to consolidate their finance tech stack, speed up reimbursements, and stop losing money to currency conversion. The results?
Reimbursements 96% faster
20% increase in team efficiency
~4% saved on international payments
From “chaotic and incredibly frustrating” to “everything just flowing”, see how Truvi revolutionised their finances with Airwallex.
Two good choices, two different markets
If you’re debating between Airwallex and Expensify, the good news is that you’re choosing between two solid options. They have their differences and those divergences separate them into two buckets of ideal customers.
Expensify is an amazing choice for businesses on the smaller side, especially if US-based.
Airwallex, on the other hand, is the platform for businesses with an eye on global expansion and unified financial operations.
Both are great at what they do, but their suitability ultimately depends on what you do. Check in on the features your company needs the most, use this article to see which provider aligns best with your situation, then make your choice.
We’ll be here, ready and waiting, if you decide to join Airwallex.
Smarter spend, faster payments, powered by AI
Disclaimer: We wrote this article in Q3 2025. The information was based on our own online research and we were not able to manually test each tool or provider. The information is provided for educational purposes only and a reader should consider the specific requirements of their business when evaluating providers. This research is reviewed every six months. If you would like to request an update, feel free to contact us at [email protected].

David Beach
Senior Content Marketing Manager - EMEA
David is a fintech writer at Airwallex, specialising in content that aids EMEA businesses in navigating global and local payments and banking. With a rich background in finance, business, and accountancy journalism, David brings over a decade of experience. Previously, he was the Head of Content and Press at a leading financial services company and trade journalist at a media group specialising in business and finance.