Stripe vs Airwallex Canada: Payment Processing vs Global Financial Operations
Airwallex Editorial Team
When payment processing isn't enough: choosing between transactional tools and global financial infrastructure
Your Canadian business processes payments smoothly. Orders flow in, cards get charged, funds hit your account. But then international expansion beckons – and suddenly you're juggling multiple currencies, cross-border supplier payments, and foreign exchange headaches that your payment processor never warned you about.
This disconnect between payment processing and comprehensive financial operations catches growing businesses off guard. While Stripe excels at accepting payments, companies expanding globally need infrastructure that handles the full spectrum of international finance. According to recent data, the global digital payment market was valued at $10.18 trillion in 2024 and is forecasted to reach $32.07 trillion by 2033 ¹. Yet payment acceptance represents just one piece of the financial operations puzzle.
Understanding the fundamental difference
Payment processors: built for transactions
Stripe revolutionized online payments by making card acceptance simple. Their infrastructure focuses on the critical moment when customers click "buy" – processing cards, handling security, and depositing funds. For businesses selling primarily to domestic customers, this transaction-focused approach works brilliantly.
The payment gateway market demonstrates this focus on transaction processing, with North America accounting for 41.1% ($52.9 billion) of payment gateway revenues ². These systems excel at their core purpose: moving money from customer to merchant.
However, payment processors typically operate within specific boundaries. They optimize for card acceptance, prioritize transaction speed, and focus on the customer-to-business flow. This specialization creates efficiency but also limitations when businesses need broader financial capabilities.
Global financial platforms: designed for operations
Financial operations platforms take a fundamentally different approach. Rather than focusing solely on accepting payments, they provide infrastructure for managing money across borders, currencies, and payment types. Airwallex, for instance, offers multi-currency accounts that let businesses hold funds in 23 currencies, plus high-speed international transfers and automated accounts payable management ³.
This operational focus addresses the reality that 47% of global payments revenues ($1 trillion) is generated in Asia Pacific, with the fastest annual growth rate of 25% excluding China ². Businesses operating internationally need infrastructure that matches this global complexity.
The difference becomes clear in practice. While payment processors help you accept customer payments, financial platforms help you pay suppliers in Shanghai, manage currency exposure from European sales, and issue corporate cards to traveling employees – all from unified infrastructure.
The hidden costs of mismatched infrastructure
Currency conversion complexity
Every international transaction involves foreign exchange, and the differences in approach matter. Payment processors typically apply their own conversion rates at the point of transaction, often with markups that businesses can't control or predict.
Consider the impact: merchants paid approximately $138 billion in processing fees in 2022 ². When you add unpredictable FX markups on top of standard processing fees, international sales become expensive quickly.
Financial platforms approach currency differently. Airwallex provides access to interbank foreign exchange rates with transparent markups of 0.3-0.6% above the interbank rate ⁴. This transparency lets businesses forecast costs accurately and make informed decisions about when to convert currencies.
Operational inefficiency at scale
Using payment processing infrastructure for broader financial operations creates workflow fragmentation. Businesses end up managing multiple systems: one for accepting payments, another for international transfers, a third for corporate cards, and perhaps a fourth for currency management.
Flightpath discovered this firsthand. Before consolidating their financial operations, they spent over 4 hours weekly just managing global transfers across different platforms ⁵. After switching to unified infrastructure, they achieved same-day settlement when collecting multiple currencies and realized significant FX savings through competitive exchange rates.
The inefficiency compounds as businesses grow. Each new market means another set of financial relationships, another system to manage, and another source of reconciliation headaches. What starts as minor friction becomes major operational burden.
Compliance and regulatory gaps
Payment processors excel at card industry compliance – PCI DSS standards, fraud prevention, and chargeback management. But international financial operations involve different regulatory requirements entirely.
Cross-border payments require adherence to anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, know-your-customer (KYC) requirements, and country-specific financial regulations. Global cross-border bank credit expanded by $1.5 trillion in the first quarter of 2025 alone, reaching a record $34.7 trillion ⁶. This massive flow requires sophisticated compliance infrastructure.
Businesses using payment processors for international operations often discover compliance gaps too late. They might process payments successfully but struggle with regulatory reporting, tax documentation, or audit requirements that payment-focused systems weren't designed to handle.
Real-world scenarios: when infrastructure choices matter
Scenario 1: The expanding e-commerce retailer
A Toronto-based fashion retailer sees 40% of sales coming from US customers. Using Stripe, they accept USD payments smoothly. But problems emerge when they need to pay their Los Angeles-based influencer partners, reimburse US-based photographers, and manage inventory purchases from New York suppliers.
With payment processing infrastructure alone, each outbound payment requires manual bank transfers with poor exchange rates. The finance team spends hours reconciling payments across systems. Corporate cards for US trade shows require separate applications and accounts.
With comprehensive financial infrastructure, the same company holds USD from sales in a US dollar account, pays partners directly from that balance, and issues multi-currency cards to employees. Everything flows through one platform with consistent FX rates and unified reporting.
Scenario 2: The B2B software company
A Vancouver SaaS company sells to enterprise clients globally. They invoice in multiple currencies and need to pay international contractors and vendors. Payment processing handles the incoming revenue, but operational complexity multiplies quickly.
Research shows that 46% of diaspora consumers across Europe regularly send money home, with 65% ranking speed as their top priority ⁷. B2B operations face similar demands for speed and efficiency, but with added complexity around invoicing, terms, and reconciliation.
Comprehensive platforms address these B2B requirements directly. They provide local collection accounts in multiple countries, automate invoice reconciliation, and enable batch payments to global vendors – capabilities that payment processors typically don't offer.
Scenario 3: The marketplace platform
A Canadian marketplace connects buyers and sellers globally. They need to collect payments from buyers, hold funds temporarily, and pay out to sellers in their local currencies. This requires more than payment processing – it requires sophisticated money movement infrastructure.
The largest 10 merchant acquirers processed $9.5 trillion in card payments in the US in 2023, but the top 3 processed 62% of the total volume while only working with 22% of the merchants ². Marketplaces need infrastructure that can handle both high volume and diverse merchant needs.
Financial platforms provide the programmatic capabilities marketplaces require. APIs for multi-currency account creation, automated seller onboarding, and scheduled payouts in local currencies transform complex operations into scalable workflows.
Technical architecture: APIs vs comprehensive platforms
The integration question
Stripe's API revolutionized payment acceptance by making integration straightforward. Developers could add payment processing to applications with minimal code. This simplicity drove adoption and established the template for modern payment infrastructure.
But financial operations require deeper integration. Airwallex offers enterprise-grade REST APIs with extensive documentation, plus direct connections to major e-commerce platforms including Shopify and WooCommerce ⁴. The APIs cover not just payment acceptance but account management, transfers, cards, and expense management.
The architectural difference reflects different use cases. Payment APIs optimize for the checkout flow. Financial platform APIs enable complex workflows like automated supplier payments, dynamic currency conversion, and multi-entity fund flows.
Scalability considerations
Payment processing scales vertically – more transactions through the same pipes. Financial operations scale horizontally – more currencies, more payment methods, more countries, more use cases.
Consider that digital wallets are forecast to process $3.1 trillion in 2027, which will be 4x more than credit cards ². Businesses need infrastructure that adapts to changing payment landscapes, not just processes more of the same transactions.
Airwallex supports over 50 currencies and offers real-time foreign exchange rates for major currency pairs ⁴. This breadth enables businesses to enter new markets without infrastructure changes, accepting local payment methods while maintaining operational efficiency.
Data and reporting depth
Payment processors provide transaction data – amounts, dates, customer details, and settlement information. This works well for reconciliation and basic reporting.
Financial platforms generate operational intelligence. They track currency exposure, analyze cross-border payment patterns, and identify optimization opportunities. Airwallex provides comprehensive analytics dashboards offering detailed insights into transaction patterns, currency exposure, and spending trends ⁴.
The data difference impacts decision-making. With payment processing data, you know what customers bought. With financial operations data, you understand your global cash position, currency risks, and operational efficiency across markets.
Making the strategic choice
When payment processing suffices
Stripe and similar processors excel for businesses that:
Operate primarily in one country
Accept payments mainly in one currency
Have simple supplier payment needs
Don't hold significant foreign currency balances
Require basic transaction reporting
For these scenarios, payment processing infrastructure provides excellent value. The simplicity, reliability, and developer experience make operations smooth and predictable.
When comprehensive infrastructure becomes critical
Businesses need financial operations platforms when:
International sales exceed 20% of revenue
Suppliers or contractors operate in multiple countries
Currency fluctuation impacts margins significantly
Teams travel internationally regularly
Expansion into new markets is planned
B2B payments complexity increases
The transition point varies by business, but the pattern remains consistent: complexity in financial operations demands infrastructure designed for that complexity.
The migration path
Moving from payment processing to comprehensive financial infrastructure doesn't require abandoning existing systems immediately. Airwallex integrates with existing payment flows while adding operational capabilities ⁸.
Businesses typically migrate in phases:
Add multi-currency accounts to hold foreign currency from existing payment processing
Implement international transfers for supplier payments
Deploy corporate cards for team expenses
Consolidate payment acceptance onto the unified platform
Automate financial workflows through API integration
This phased approach minimizes disruption while delivering immediate operational benefits.
Ready to grow globally?
The future of financial infrastructure
Embedded finance evolution
The distinction between payment processing and financial operations continues to blur. Major retailers like Walmart are already adopting account-to-account payment methods, potentially bypassing traditional card rails entirely ⁹.
This shift toward embedded finance means businesses need infrastructure that adapts to new payment methods, not just processes existing ones. Platforms that started with comprehensive capabilities are better positioned for this evolution than those retrofitting payment processors.
Regulatory complexity acceleration
Financial regulations continue multiplying. The Department of Homeland Security identified 45 different federal cyber incident reporting requirements in 2023, administered by 22 federal agencies ¹⁰. This regulatory complexity extends to financial operations, where businesses must navigate country-specific requirements.
Comprehensive platforms invest in regulatory infrastructure that payment processors typically don't maintain. This becomes a competitive advantage as compliance requirements increase.
Technology convergence
Artificial intelligence, real-time payments, and blockchain technologies are reshaping financial services. The financial technology landscape is evolving rapidly, with these technologies playing significant roles ¹¹.
Businesses need infrastructure that incorporates these advances. Payment processors focus on optimizing existing rails. Financial platforms experiment with new technologies that could transform how businesses manage global operations.
Conclusion: infrastructure aligned with ambition
The choice between Stripe and Airwallex isn't really about payment processing versus financial operations – it's about aligning infrastructure with business trajectory. Companies content with domestic operations and simple payment acceptance find excellent solutions in payment processors.
But businesses with global ambitions need infrastructure that matches those ambitions. They need platforms that handle not just how money comes in, but how it moves through and out of the organization across borders, currencies, and use cases.
The evidence supports making this infrastructure decision early. Flightpath's experience – saving 4+ hours weekly and achieving same-day settlement across currencies – demonstrates the operational impact of unified financial infrastructure ⁵. McLaren Racing modernized cross-border payments entirely, while RYSE transformed complex cross-border finances into streamlined, efficient global operations ³.
For Canadian businesses evaluating financial infrastructure, the question isn't whether you need comprehensive capabilities today. It's whether your growth trajectory will demand them tomorrow. Building on infrastructure that scales with ambition – rather than constrains it – makes the difference between managing growth and enabling it.
The global financial landscape continues evolving, with cross-border complexity increasing and new payment methods emerging constantly. Businesses that choose infrastructure designed for this complexity position themselves to capitalize on global opportunities rather than being limited by transactional tools. The choice you make today about financial infrastructure determines not just how you'll process payments, but how effectively you'll compete in global markets tomorrow.
FAQ
What's the main difference between Stripe and Airwallex for Canadian businesses?
Stripe focuses primarily on payment processing - accepting payments from customers online and in-person. Airwallex offers a comprehensive global financial operations platform that includes payment processing plus multi-currency accounts, international money transfers, expense management, and foreign exchange services. While Stripe excels at getting you paid, Airwallex helps manage your entire international financial workflow.
When should a Canadian business choose Airwallex over Stripe?
Canadian businesses should consider Airwallex when they need to pay international suppliers, manage multiple currencies, handle significant foreign exchange volumes, or require comprehensive financial infrastructure for global operations. According to Airwallex's platform capabilities, they support over 50 currencies with real-time FX rates, making them ideal for businesses with complex international financial needs beyond simple payment acceptance.
How do the costs compare between Stripe and Airwallex?
Stripe typically charges 2.9% + 30¢ per transaction for online payments in Canada, with additional fees for international cards. Airwallex's pricing varies based on services used - they offer competitive payment processing rates plus separate pricing for FX transfers, multi-currency accounts, and other financial services. For businesses doing significant international transactions, Airwallex's bundled approach often provides better overall value.
Can Airwallex replace Stripe entirely for payment processing?
Yes, Airwallex can handle payment processing similar to Stripe, accepting online and mobile payments from customers. However, Stripe has a more mature ecosystem with extensive integrations and developer tools. Airwallex's strength lies in combining payment acceptance with broader financial operations, making it ideal for businesses that need both customer payment processing and comprehensive international financial management.
What embedded finance capabilities does Airwallex offer that Stripe doesn't?
Airwallex provides embedded finance solutions that allow businesses to integrate financial services directly into their platforms, including multi-currency wallets, international payment rails, and FX services. As noted in their embedded finance guide, this enables businesses to offer financial services to their own customers, creating new revenue streams while improving user experience - capabilities that go beyond Stripe's payment-focused offerings.
How does Airwallex's global reach compare to Stripe's for Canadian businesses?
Both platforms serve Canadian businesses globally, but with different strengths. Stripe operates in 46+ countries with strong coverage in North America and Europe. Airwallex, founded in Australia and valued at over $5.5 billion, has particularly strong presence in Asia-Pacific markets and emerging economies. For Canadian businesses expanding into Asian markets or needing comprehensive cross-border financial services, Airwallex often provides better infrastructure and local expertise.
Citations
View this article in another region:Canada - Français
Airwallex Editorial Team
Airwallex’s Editorial Team is a global collective of business finance and fintech writers based in Australia, Asia, North America, and Europe. With deep expertise spanning finance, technology, payments, startups, and SMEs, the team collaborates closely with experts, including the Airwallex Product team and industry leaders to produce this content.
Share
- When payment processing isn't enough: choosing between transactional tools and global financial infrastructure
- Understanding the fundamental difference
- The hidden costs of mismatched infrastructure
- Real-world scenarios: when infrastructure choices matter
- Technical architecture: APIs vs comprehensive platforms
- Making the strategic choice
- The future of financial infrastructure
- Conclusion: infrastructure aligned with ambition
- FAQ
- Citations
